Municipal
Water Treatment
Disinfection Creates New Problems
In the summer of 2003, the EPA activated the second
phase of the Disinfection
Byproducts Rule (DBPR). Until the establishment of the DBPR,
the EPA had been concerned only with how much (or how little) municipal
facilities were removing from the water. Little attention was given
to what was added to the water in the treatment process and the
subsequent reactions taking place within. Studies completed throughout
the 1970's and 1980's provided revealing insight as to the problematic
disinfection byproducts formed upon injecting chlorine, chloramines
and chlorine dioxide into contaminated water. Discovery of the dangers
of Trihalomethanes (THMs) and Haloacetic acids (HAAs) led the EPA
to form the DBPR, part of the larger Microbial Disinfection Byproduct
Rule (M-DBR).
The DBPR is of great concern to the operators and
engineers of the over 170,000 public water systems throughout the
U. S. The reason being is that, with small exception, chlorine is
the primary disinfectant applied to raw water throughout the U.
S. Chlorine is also the single contributing factor in the production
of THMs and HAAs in treated water.
The residents of Las Vegas receive their drinking
water from Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA). The SNWA treats
490 MGD of water from the Colorado River with two facilities, both
utilizing ozone for disinfection. Because of this, the amount of
THMs and HAAs has dropped to record lows. Ron Zegers, director of
SNWA stated, "It has improved the water's clarity by 10 times
of what it was before we started the system."
Prior to 1974 only a handful of treatment facilities
were employing ozone as a disinfectant and to remove color and odor.
Following The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), the number has grown
dramatically. As of 2000, over 250 drinking water plants use ozone
within the United States. That number is expected to double within
the next few years with the finalization of the DBPR.
Click
here to find out more about the DBPR. |